Oklahoma City Thunder vs Indiana Pacers Match Player Stats

When Shai Gilgeous-Alexander dropped 55 points in an overtime thriller against Indiana on October 23, 2025, it was just the latest chapter in one of the NBA’s most compelling recent rivalries. The Thunder and Pacers have traded haymakers all year — from Oklahoma City’s statement win in the NBA Finals to Indiana’s shocking upset in January 2026.

Thunder Final Score (Jun 9, 2025): 123 ·
Pacers Final Score (Jun 9, 2025): 107 ·
Pacers FG% (Oct 11, 2025): 47% ·
Thunder FG% (Oct 11, 2025): 39% ·
Game Date (Upcoming): Oct 23, 2025

Where is Thunder vs Pacers Game 3?

Game 3 of the NBA Finals landed at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, the Pacers’ home arena during their run to the championship series. That venue became a fortress for Indiana during the 2024-25 playoff push, drawing sellout crowds energized by the team’s deepest run in decades.

Venue: Gainbridge Fieldhouse

Gainbridge Fieldhouse, the Pacers’ home since 1999, seats approximately 17,500 fans and has undergone multiple renovations to enhance the modern NBA experience. During the Finals, it served as the site of Games 3 and 4, with Indiana splitting those contests against Oklahoma City’s relentless attack.

Game Context

The Finals format placed Games 1-2 in Oklahoma City, followed by Games 3-4 in Indianapolis, before returning to Chesapeake Energy Arena for Games 5-7 as needed. Oklahoma City closed out the series in seven games, but the Pacers’ home-court advantage showed in their two victories on that court.

The implication: Gainbridge Fieldhouse remains central to the Pacers’ identity in big games. Whether they can flip that home success into regular-season dominance against OKC will shape their 2025-26 narrative.

Who’s the best player on the Oklahoma City Thunder?

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has answered that question emphatically against Indiana. His 35.8 points per game against the Pacers in 2025-26 head-to-head matchups ranks him among the most prolific scorers in any individual team series this season.

2025-2026 Season Leaders

Looking at the full Thunder roster in their matchups against the Pacers, the statistical leaders stand out clearly. Gilgeous-Alexander leads with 35.8 points per game and 5.8 assists per game against Indiana. Isaiah Hartenstein dominates the boards at 11.0 rebounds per game while shooting an efficient 57.58% from the field. Chet Holmgren contributes 1.25 blocks per game and connects at 41.67% from three-point range. Cason Wallace disrupts opposing possessions with 2.67 steals per game in this matchup.

Key Stats vs Pacers

The Thunder’s offensive profile against the Pacers shows 121.0 points per game, 50.8 rebounds, 45.55% field goal percentage, and 27.92% from three-point range. Oklahoma City has averaged +7.7 points per game in differential across their early 2025-26 matchups against Indiana, with a perfect 4-0 record in those contests.

What this means: Gilgeous-Alexander isn’t just the Thunder’s best player — he’s arguably the most dangerous individual scorer in any Pacers matchup. His 55-point performance in October 2025 wasn’t an outlier but a continuation of his dominance.

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Indiana Pacers Oct 23, 2025 Player Stats

The October 23, 2025 overtime game delivered one of the season’s most electrifying individual performances. Gilgeous-Alexander scored 55 points as Oklahoma City outlasted Indiana 141-135 in extra periods.

Box Score Highlights

Bennedict Mathurin countered with 36 points for the Pacers in that loss, highlighting a recurring theme: Indiana’s supporting cast often keeps games competitive even when the top-line matchup favors Oklahoma City. The game exceeded 231.5 total points, reflecting the pace and efficiency both teams brought to that matchup. The Pacers covered +7.5 as underdogs despite losing, covering the spread while taking the overtime defeat.

Top Performers

Gilgeous-Alexander’s 55-point output came alongside his standard complementary contributions — rebounds, assists, and defensive activity that define his two-way impact. Mathurin’s 36 points established him as a legitimate secondary weapon for Indiana, someone who can shoulder scoring loads when Pascal Siakam faces concentrated defensive attention. The game represented a microcosm of the broader rivalry: high-scoring, competitive, and decided by the thinnest of margins.

The pattern: when Gilgeous-Alexander gets hot against the Pacers, he gets historically hot. His 55-point game wasn’t random — it reflected an emerging track record of Oklahoma City’s star exploiting Indiana’s defensive schemes.

Thunder 123-107 Pacers Jun 9, 2025 Player Stats

This mid-June contest represented a pivotal moment before the NBA Finals, with Oklahoma City establishing clear offensive superiority over Indiana in the lead-up to their championship showdown. The 16-point margin hinted at the gap that would later manifest in Game 7.

Pascal Siakam Performance

Pascal Siakam’s contributions against Oklahoma City have consistently anchored the Pacers’ competitive efforts. Across 2025-26 matchups, Siakam averages 26.0 points, 10.3 rebounds, and 6.0 assists against the Thunder — forming the backbone of Indiana’s offensive system. His ability to score from the mid-range, finish at the rim, and facilitate for teammates creates multi-dimensional problems for opposing defenses.

Cason Wallace Contributions

On the Oklahoma City side, Cason Wallace’s defensive presence against the Pacers includes his 2.67 steals per game in this matchup. Wallace’s activity level disrupts Indiana’s offensive flow, generating transition opportunities that amplify the Thunder’s already-potent transition attack. His contributions exemplify how Oklahoma City’s depth creates advantages beyond their superstar scorers.

The catch: Siakam’s 26.0 points per game looks productive until measured against Gilgeous-Alexander’s 35.8. The Pacers need more from their supporting cast — Mathurin’s 36-point games and solid three-point shooting at 50% — to genuinely close that gap.

Pacers 116-101 Thunder Oct 11, 2025 Player Stats

This October matchup stands as Indiana’s most complete performance of the 2025 head-to-head series. The Pacers led wire-to-wire, building a comfortable cushion that Oklahoma City never seriously threatened in the second half.

Team FG% Comparison

The shooting percentages tell the story clearly. Indiana connected at 47% from the field while Oklahoma City managed just 39% — a significant efficiency gap that translated directly to the 15-point final margin. The Pacers’ offensive execution against the Thunder showcased better shot selection, crisper ball movement, and more consistent finishing around the rim. Oklahoma City’s lower field goal percentage reflected both defensive pressure from Indiana and some cold shooting nights from their primary scorers.

Standout Players

Beyond the team metrics, individual Pacers delivered their best performances of the early season. The shooting distribution showed balance across Indiana’s rotation, with multiple players contributing 15+ points to offset Oklahoma City’s occasional spurts. Defensively, the Pacers’ 4.67 blocks per game in 2025-26 matchups against the Thunder reflects their commitment to protecting the rim and contesting interior shots. That defensive activity created transition opportunities that fed their offensive rhythm.

The trade-off: the Pacers’ 47% shooting looks impressive, but Oklahoma City’s 39% represents an outlier rather than a baseline. The Thunder’s 45.55% season average against Indiana suggests they’re better positioned for the long haul.

NBA Finals Game 7 Breakdown: Quarter-by-Quarter

The June 22, 2025 NBA Finals Game 7 produced Oklahoma City’s championship-clinching 103-91 victory over Indiana. Examining the quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown reveals how the Thunder gradually overwhelmed the Pacers despite Indianapolis’ competitive early effort.

The third quarter proved decisive — Oklahoma City outscored Indiana 34-20, a 14-point swing that transformed a close contest into a comfortable lead. The Pacers kept pace through the first half and competed hard in the fourth quarter, but that third-quarter drought proved fatal. Oklahoma City covered -6.5 in the betting spread, reflecting their clear on-court superiority in the decisive period.

The implication: Indiana competed hard enough to cover the spread in most quarters, but Oklahoma City’s ability to land haymaker after haymaker in the third quarter separated them from genuine championship-level execution. The 215.5 under reflects how defensive intensity limited total scoring in the clincher.

Oklahoma City 141, Indiana 135 (OT) | Gilgeous-Alexander 55 Pts | Mathurin 36 Pts

ESPN Sports Network

OKC wins series 4-3 | Thunder 103-91 Pacers (Jun 22, 2025) NBA Finals Game 7

NBA Official Stats Database

For Thunder fans, Gilgeous-Alexander’s consistent dominance against Indiana validates Oklahoma City’s championship window. For Pacers supporters, the competitive spreads, Mathurin’s emergence, and Siakam’s two-way production offer genuine reasons for optimism — even if the win-loss column hasn’t reflected it yet. The next scheduled matchup will test whether Indiana can finally convert statistical competitiveness into victories.